Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mili Poljicak vs Matic Dimic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Poljicak vs Dimic analysis and find out who is favored!
Mili Poljicak vs Matic Dimic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Poljicak 1 - 0 Dimic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Poljicak has won 52.37% of points on their second serve, while Dimic has won 53.33%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Poljicak, in recent form, has won 49.44% of their opponent's second serve points, while Dimic has won 55.56%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.09% and 34.62% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Poljicak has saved 57.32% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Dimic has saved 60% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Poljicak has won 56.06% of matches played (W/L 37/ 29), with Dimic winning 53.33% (W/L 16/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Poljicak has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 15/ 12), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Dimic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 48/ 47), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Poljicak has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.07% of matches (W/L 36/ 22), where as Dimic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.33% of matches (W/L 16/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Poljicak winning 1 times and Dimic being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Poljicak winning 2 and Dimic winning 1. The last match between Poljicak and Dimic was at the M25 Maribor, 06-09-2023, First, Clay with Mili Poljicak getting the victory 6-1 1-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:2:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Poljicak and Dimic have played a deciding set 1 times, with Poljicak winning 1 times and Dimic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Poljicak winning 0, and Dimic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Poljicak has played against opponents with an average rank of 131.32 while Dimic has played against players with an average rank of 51.57.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Poljicak has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Dimic has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Poljicak has converted 46.98% of breakpoint opportunities, and Dimic has converted 43.75% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
693
Rank
462
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
51% (70-68)
Career Total W/L
50% (67-67)
66% (27-14)
YTD W/L
50% (1-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mili Poljicak | Matic Dimic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:2:0 | 2:2:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (47/81) | 66% (51/77) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (33/47) | 55% (28/51) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (16/34) | 54% (14/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (35/77) | 40% (32/81) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 1-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Mili Poljicak
Player
Matic Dimic
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mili Poljicak | Matic Dimic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 66% (27/14) | 50% (1/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (59/37) | 60% (3/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (503/426) | 49% (24/25) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 70% (23/10) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.45 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 204 | 4 |
| DFs per game | 0.11 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 51 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:52 | 2:5:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 165.02 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (1592/2839) | 65% (111/171) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (1127/1592) | 59% (65/111) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (653/1247) | 53% (32/60) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (140/298) | 44% (7/16) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (1232/2962) | 41% (61/149) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (26/13) | 50% (1/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 66% (27/41) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 64% (9/14) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (30/25) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (30/5) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 0% (1/0) |
Mili Poljicak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Luka Mikrut
Player
Mili Poljicak
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
13 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mili Poljicak
Player
Sebastian Eriksson
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mili Poljicak
Player
Robert Strombachs
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
70%
(
84 of
120)
13
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
55 of
84)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
30%
(
27 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
47 of
120)
109
Total Points Won
100
|
7-5 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mili Poljicak
Player
Duje Markovina
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
77
|
6-7(2) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gabriele Pennaforti
Player
Mili Poljicak
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mili Poljicak
Player
Gabriel Decamps
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mili Poljicak
Player
Vojtech Vales
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mili Poljicak
Player
Filip Krolo
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Mili Poljicak
75%
(
58 of
77)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mili Poljicak
Player
Milos Karol
41%
(
22 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Matic Dimic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Hrazdil
Player
Matic Dimic
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
36 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
6-0 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matic Dimic
Player
Ignacio Monzon
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louis Wessels
Player
Matic Dimic
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matic Dimic
Player
Adam Jones
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Matic Dimic
Player
Abdulhamid Mubarak
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Matic Dimic
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matic Dimic
Player
Julian Desousa
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matic Dimic
Player
Moritz Schroeter
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bor Artnak
Player
Matic Dimic
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matic Dimic
Player
Boris Butulija
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
38%
(
15 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Poljicak Vs Dimic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
